{
  "review": "Fresh blind review of source.json, source-contact-sheet.jpg, design.png, and all nine corresponding source/key image pairs only.",
  "overall_meets_bar": false,
  "source_pose_composition": "Composition broadly meets the bar: the near left rider/helper, crossing equipment, fixed central support and distant pair remain recognizable. The foreground rider's pose is the remaining weak point.",
  "same_doodle_identity": "Meets the bar. The long outlined plank, angular triangular support and spare hand-drawn line language retain the design's identity within the larger scene.",
  "hinge_action": "Meets the sampled-pose bar. The active board changes inclination around the same central support, rises to a high left endpoint and returns; the support and surrounding equipment remain fixed.",
  "rider_helper_contact_occlusion": "Broad attachment and overlap order are readable in the samples, but the rider's upright box-like body and minimally articulated legs make the high poses read as standing on the board rather than sitting astride it as in the source.",
  "one_most_important_gap": "The foreground rider's seated pose is insufficiently legible, especially in keys 05 through 07.",
  "smallest_repair": "Keep the existing head, body style, board path and helper. Redraw only the rider's lower-body lines into a clear seated hip on the plank with two bent knees and short hanging or forward feet, preserving the seat-to-board attachment throughout the lift and return.",
  "playback_evidence": "No actual normal-speed playback was performed. This verdict is based on the supplied still samples; timing, interpolation, fluidity and between-sample contact are unverified. comparison.mp4 was not opened or checked through metadata or decoding."
}