{
  "film": 77,
  "title": "ROWS AND FLOCKS",
  "version": "V01",
  "duration_seconds": 80,
  "reports": [
    {
      "critic": "A",
      "report": "CRITIC_A_V01.txt",
      "verdict": "Verdict: QUALIFIED VISUAL PASS for distinct human/environmental processes held in a recognizable visual counterpoint. Native-speed contemplative duration, musical contribution, score-versus-silence preference and whole audiovisual acceptance remain INCONCLUSIVE. The literal bench/reeds/contact-sound proof is unperformed, not passed."
    },
    {
      "critic": "B",
      "report": "CRITIC_B_V01.txt",
      "verdict": "Verdict: bounded VISUAL PASS for the stated archival comparison. Full audiovisual, native-speed contemplative-duration acceptance and the original prompt's full proof remain INCONCLUSIVE. No comparable Baraka excerpt was inspected, so I do not issue 'reference stronger.'"
    }
  ],
  "full_AV_acceptance": "not established; native-speed viewing and audio audition unavailable",
  "scope_and_limits": "Gardening rows and bird-flock fields alternate at transfer duration. Hand placement and wider row context contrast with ground density and takeoff. Garden reprise is declared at entry; the garden transition retains its native dissolve, and wildlife units retain native cuts. No common ecosystem, bird purpose, bench repair, new accommodation or new final consequence. Main uses newly composed numerical score; unscored comparison is digital silence, not natural ambience.",
  "original_full_cycle_078": "not applicable"
}