062 V02 — INDEPENDENT COLOR CRITIC B REVISION REVIEW Verdict: qualified VISUAL PASS. The red-continuity defect identified in V01 is materially repaired in the actual revised images. No target-display,colorimetric,audio or normal-speed experiential acceptance is claimed. Method: Preserved my independent V01 report before seeing V02. Inspected all four actual ordered V02 sheets across0–59seconds. Independently decoded main39–48 at4fps,displayed at640pixels wide; enlarged actual42.00 and45.00 to native960x540. This is a focused repair review with whole-film1fps context; unchanged V01 was inspected throughout at4fps. The proposed repair was described by the parent before my V02 viewing. No builder script/timeline,transform ledger or another critic report read. No audio/native real-time playback. Source-hue observations rely on the actual native-transfer spot checks already documented in V01,not a new full source audit. Timing precision about0.25seconds. Actual revised red passage: At40.00 the narrow crop concentrates on the waiting glass and pitcher spout. Around40.25 the red stream enters;the liquid visibly accumulates through42.25;the stream ceases/pitcher clears around42.5–42.75;the filled red glass remains through43.75. This is a quiet,practical,completed action with red becoming more—not less—prominent as it occurs. The blue-green cloth and yellow corner remain as a bridge from prior hues,but the red drink now has enough area and duration to command attention. At44.00 the tighter can/opener view follows. The red band occupies a substantial central region. A hand works the lever,can lowers and its lid separates around45–46;the red object subsequently exits,leaving the white mechanism/blue tile. This preserves function and consequence while the closer view makes red more than a tiny accent. It is still a consumer-product demonstration,with visible commercial branding,but the actual action prevents it from being merely a color specimen. The previous short red-club insert and weakly red wide golf swing are absent. I now read a definite40–47 red passage: red as something being dispensed/contained,then a red-banded container being opened. This satisfies my earlier falsifiable condition—two concrete practical uses carried by visible red regions—more securely than V01. I do not pass simply because the recipe was followed;the red area actually develops in the first action and remains central in the second. Whole-boundary assessment: Yellow2–17 still moves from domestic vessel to industrial machine. Mixed yellow/blue sails17–24 remain a clear bridge. Blue24–40 remains strongest in the chair and especially fabric/red-support reveal;the boy at28–33 is still its weakest chromatic member because white paper/black tabletop dominate and blue is chiefly clothing. The fabric33–40 sets up the red support before the red stream40–44 becomes the new focus. The sequence now has three discernible hue passages with different scales/functions,without assigning universal emotions to the colors. Final47–57 still brings blue-green cloth,yellow pitcher and red drink into one shared serving setting. The actual glass fills around49.25–51.5;pitcher returns upright53–54;hand clears and the objects remain together. The visual payoff survives. Its formal role changes slightly: because the same pour has now been seen tightly at40–44,the ending is a replay in wider context rather than a wholly withheld action finally revealed. The47-second return to an empty glass visibly resets time after the already-filled close-up. I can read this as deliberate close/wide recapitulation,not a new second serving to a demonstrably different glass. Do not describe it as a continuous unbroken service event or two distinct pours. This is an acceptable adaptation choice but a real tradeoff of the repair. Largest remaining gap: 28–33seconds,the boy's tabletop activity. The action is definite but chromatic membership is weaker than adjacent sails/chair/fabric;the blue shirt is subdued and the white sheets dominate. This reservation does not now block my visual pass because blue is strongly established around it and the action adds working use among leisure/shelter uses. The larger source design-showcase character remains visible in arrangements,dissolves and brand/product views;the film has not become observational footage of newly performed labor. Falsifiable optional refinement: Show V02 to fresh viewers without a synopsis and ask which hue carries the boy/table scene and whether the final pour feels like returning to the first setting or accidentally repeating an action. If the boy is consistently read as outside the blue passage,compare a crop that keeps his hand action and more blue shirt while reducing white-paper area,with unchanged hue. If the final reset is consistently read as a continuity mistake,compare an ending that begins on the shared scene after the glass is filled,retaining the yellow/blue/red aftermath;do not fabricate a second glass or recolor the drink. Neither adjustment is mandatory from this image-based review alone. Color/source limits: The native transfer previously inspected around388–401 contains the same red drink,yellow pitcher,blue-green cloth,red-banded can and blue tile. Revised crops enlarge existing source regions rather than displaying an obvious hue substitution. That visual correspondence is not a complete transform/profile audit. No certification of source tonal range,target-display appearance or absence of subtle grade changes is implied. The supplied picture-only version was verified picture-identical for V01;I have not independently repeated decoded identity verification for V02,and no soundtrack contribution has been judged. Disposition: accept the actual red repair and retain the useful wider ending. The chromatic-function proposition now clears my prior visual threshold. Preserve mixed sails,the fabric becoming occupied shelter,the practical red actions and final shared situation. Scope remains an archival adaptation,not the prompt's literal new glove/repair scene,and full real-time audiovisual acceptance remains pending.